Connect with us

Entertainment

Kim Kardashian debunks rumors about Baby No. 4

Kim Kardashian is revealing whether or not she Kanye West are currently planning for a fourth child.

The Keeping Up With the Kardashians star and the “Stronger” rapper share kids North West , 5, Saint West , 2, and Chicago West , who they welcomed via a surrogate in January. Earlier this week,reports surfaced stating that the couple is planning for a fourth baby. So what does Kim have to say about the rumors?

The KKW Beauty founder addressed the speculation during an exclusive interview with E! News at the Christie’s x What Goes Around Comes Around 25th Anniversary Auction on Tuesday evening in Beverly Hills.

“I don’t know, I don’t know, I read that, I read something…none of that was true,” Kim told us of the reports. “But I’ve been really open about it and talked about it on our show, so…I don’t know.”

“We start filming season 16 next week, so if I think about it more and it’s gonna happen, you’ll definitely see it on the show,” Kim shared. “But as of now, no.”
Fans of KUWTK will remember Kim’s journey to have a third child. During a Nov. 2016 episode of the show, Kim explored the idea of surrogacy after meeting with two doctors who told her it “wouldn’t be safe” for her to get pregnant again. Kim experienced difficulties during her first two pregnancies, and it was explained to her that if she were to get pregnant again it would be considered a “high-risk pregnancy.”

“Lately I’ve been thinking I would love to maybe have another baby,” Kim said. “But like I had two really difficult pregnancies and really difficult deliveries so getting pregnant again it’s something that does concern me.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

BBNaija2019: Khafi Threatens To Sue The Sun Over “Damaging” Publication

Khafi Kareem in her London Metropolitan Police uniform

The management of Khafi Kareem, an enormous Brother Naija constant, has vulnerable to sue The Sun, a British tabloid, over what it considers “repulsive and damaging publication” regarding her.

This was contained in an exceedingly statement free via Khafi’s Instagram page.

Khafi, presently within the massive Brother reality programme, became fashionable viewers for her relationship and sexual activities with another housemate, Gedoni.

The Sun had on weekday according that Khafi, United Nations agency could be a laptop with the Metropolitan Police, had been denied permission by the organisation to participate within the reality show.

However, reacting to the report, Khafi’s management aforesaid it’s considering a legal choice against country tabloid except it publically apologises and retract the now-viral report.

The statement read: “The attention of Khafi’s management has been drawn to a publication by The Sun Britain on weekday, August 13, 2019, titled ‘LOIN OF DUTY Met Police ‘poster girl’ faces sack for ‘having sex’ on Nigerian massive Brother when being told to not take part’.

“The brazen sensational and denigrating outburst by The Sun Britain is written in poor style while not considering the ethics of journalism that seeks balance and sound judgement.

“At no time did The Sun Britain send a mail of inquiry to Khafi’s official email that is blasted across her social media platforms beneath active management to substantiate or refute the claims within the publication.

“Khafi’s aspect of the story is deliberately and handily omitted to sell a pre-conceived narrative whereas responses from “outraged colleagues” and “other papers” riddle the publication.

“This comes from a repressing culture of shaming and characterising girls for his or her sexual choices and life decisions.

“We realize The Sun UK’s publication repulsive and damaging to the image and bread and butter of our consumer.

“We demand an on the spot retraction of the publication by The Sun Britain and a public apology to our consumer Khafilat Kareem inside succeeding forty eight hours.

“Legal choices also are being thought of at now.”

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Fast & Furious 9: Hobbs and Shaw movie reviews

Fast and furious 9

The those that created “Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw” apprehend that Dwayne Johnson (Luke Hobbs) and Jason Statham (Deckard Shaw) have a simple adversarial chemistry. They build the film around their put-downs and pranks. Statham stays targeted on however Johnson’s size makes him appear reasonably dumb and clear. And Johnson picks on what Associate in Nursing indecipherably British imaginary creature Statham is. At some purpose, Hobbs gets a load of Shaw’s stable of sports cars and asks if he’s, uh, overcompensating.

 

 

Seems right for 2 individuals Associate in Nursing yankee agent Associate in Nursingd Associate in Nursing English mercenary United Nations agency spent an exciting sequence at the highest of the seventh “Fast & Furious” film throwing one another through glass windows and designer piece of furniture. This spinoff is additional of a similar. But, written by Chris Morgan, who’s handled most of the “Fast & Furious” movies, and role player Pearce, it weighs less and appears to understand that, too. David Leitch directed it, and also the fights and chases succeed a form of swish brutality that produces sense for the maker of “Atomic Blonde” and also the second “Deadpool” and United Nations agency had a hand within the 1st “John Wick.” it’s a decent hip-hop audio recording and also the style of coherent writing that you just want for one thing with this abundant close bone-breaking. The weight, however, extends to a plot that produces no sense, Associate in Nursingd involves an extinction-level virus that Shaw’s intelligence-agent sister, Hattie (Vanessa Kirby), has heroically injected into herself which doesn’t the least bit diminish her legerity, wit or capability for flirt.

The filmmakers thus wish to take care of the joshing between Johnson and Statham that the movie’s ostensible action label and also the lust Shaw fears Hobbs has for his sister want pretexts for the romantic comedy “Hobbs & Shaw” nearly is. Idris Elba plays the movie’s biomechanically increased supervillain, and not that way into things, he wonders aloud who’s about to stop him. So, for a solution, there’s a move a split screen of Johnson and Statham in their various beds. every goes concerning his day — wakening, eating, exercising, taking phone calls at the same time with the precise same response. “Jinx!” i believed to myself.

None of that produces “Hobbs & Shaw” higher. It doesn’t save the film from a saggy setup for the face-off, in Samoa, between Elba’s anonymous paramilitary goons and Hobbs’s largely anonymous Samoan family.

Estrangement is that the movie’s huge theme — Shaw hasn’t seen his sister in ages, and Hobbs swore he’d ne’er return to it island (meaning his good 9-year-old female offspring has ne’er met her formidable grandmother). The film doesn’t care concerning the strains in these relationships, thus why strain them? Nothing changes if Hobbs and his brother (Cliff Curtis) ar on smart speaking terms. They’d still assemble dozens of their siblings and cousins for the finale’s different phases. They’d still fathom the way to affix a bunch of trucks to a flying chopper. It’s simply additional pretext.

The whole factor simply makes Maine miss however attractive and violent movies wont to be. Here, all the violence is sex. Only, it’s not. It’s simply winking. That chastity could be a quiet lament within the sidekick film possible to be taking part in across the hall from this one, Quentin Tarantino’s

That film incorporates a heap to mourn, as well as the concept that sex has gone out of the flicks. At some purpose, Tarantino shows North American nation a motion picture for Joe Namath and Ann-Margret in “C.C. and Company,” a loud, dumb, fun bike romp from 1970 within which all Namath will is tussle, drive and, with her, fool around. A film like that portended twenty years of action-thrillers that additionally had a sexual desire. the ladies didn’t forever fare well, however no one feared sex. That was as present as smoking and guns.

We don’t believe the sex any longer. All we’ve got now could be the guns. once “Hobbs & Shaw” whisks everyone to a Moscow mansion stocked attractive thieves and Shaw walks in and plants one right the inciter (Eiza González), Hobbs and also the sister look on in horror. We’re grossed out, too. he’s overcompensating.

Continue Reading

Trending